Warshak v. USA

Sixth Circuit: July 11, 2008

Appeal from the Southern District of Ohio

Before: Batchelder, Moore, Gilman, Cook, Martin, Gibbons, Griffin, Sutton, Rogers, Cole, Mckeague, Clay, Boggs, Daughtrey

Full Text: PDF

Tagged: discrimination, first amendment, fourth amendment

Authorities Cited: United States Code 18 U.S.C. § 2510(17) 18 U.S.C. § 2701 18 U.S.C. § 2703(a) 18 U.S.C. § 2703(b)(1)(B) 18 U.S.C. § 2703(d) 18 U.S.C. § 2705(a) 18 U.S.C. § 2705(a)(2) Supreme Court 362 U.S. 17, 22-23 387 U.S. 136, 149 387 U.S. 158, 163-164 388 U.S. 41 392 U.S. 40, 59 403 U.S. 388 405 U.S. 645, 656 441 U.S. 520, 560 442 U.S. 465, 467-471 445 U.S. 573, 576-589 451 U.S. 390, 395 468 U.S. 897 480 U.S. 340, 349 480 U.S. 709, 718 481 U.S. 739 489 U.S. 602, 632 497 U.S. 871, 894 505 U.S. 833, 895 520 U.S. 43, 66 523 U.S. 83, 102 523 U.S. 296, 300-301 523 U.S. 726, 734 533 U.S. 194, 201 538 U.S. 803, 808 541 U.S. 600 547 U.S. 843, 848 Circuit Courts 71 F.3d 563, 568 132 F.3d 272, 285 319 F.3d 259, 273 332 F.3d 983, 988 351 F.3d 697, 706 356 F.3d 651, 669 490 F.3d 455, 467-482 511 F.3d 535, 542

Blogged: How Appealing "Can authorities spy on your private e-mail? Appeals court retains warrantless search in Berkeley case." How Appealing En banc Sixth Circuit vacates preliminary injunction limiting the federal government's ability to seize email communication without first providing the email account holder with prior notice and an opportunity to be heard Volokh Conspiracy Sixth Circuit Hands Down En Banc Decision in Warshak v. United States: