Osborne v. Dist. Attorneys Office For The Third Judicial Dist.
Ninth Circuit: April 2, 2008
Appeal from the District of Alaska
Before: Fletcher, Goodwin, Brunetti
Full Text: PDF
Tagged: criminal
Authorities Cited: 28 U.S.C. § 1291 42 U.S.C. § 1983 312 U.S. 496 373 U.S. 83, 87 401 U.S. 37 424 U.S. 800 427 U.S. 97 428 U.S. 465, 491-492 443 U.S. 307, 324 467 U.S. 479, 485 473 U.S. 667, 682-683 480 U.S. 39, 57 492 U.S. 1, 9 499 U.S. 467, 492-495 506 U.S. 390, 405-417 512 U.S. 477 513 U.S. 298 514 U.S. 419, 434-436 536 U.S. 403, 412-422 547 U.S. 518 831 F.2d 176, 177 979 F.2d 746, 749-750 94 F.3d 1321, 1323-1325 114 F.3d 1002 132 F.3d 463, 476 211 F.3d 1148, 1164-1165 278 F.3d 370, 375-379 285 F.3d 298, 316-325 296 F.3d 770 321 F.3d 915, 919 358 F.3d 1117, 1123-1124 379 F.3d 813, 818-819 423 F.3d 1050, 1054-1056 460 F.3d 1328, 1337 477 F.3d 1070, 1075 Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2) 445 F. Supp. 2d 1079 460 F. Supp. 2d 226, 246
Blogged: How Appealing Unanimous three-judge Ninth Circuit panel recognizes a state convict's limited due process right of access to the evidence, used to convict him of sexual assault, for purposes of post-conviction DNA testing Decision of the Day Remarkable Ninth Circuit Decision on Inmate’s Right to New DNA Testing