Osborne v. Dist. Attorneys Office For The Third Judicial Dist.

Ninth Circuit: April 2, 2008

Appeal from the District of Alaska

Before: Fletcher, Goodwin, Brunetti

Full Text: PDF

Tagged: criminal

Authorities Cited: United States Code 28 U.S.C. § 1291 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Supreme Court 312 U.S. 496 373 U.S. 83, 87 401 U.S. 37 424 U.S. 800 427 U.S. 97 428 U.S. 465, 491-492 443 U.S. 307, 324 467 U.S. 479, 485 473 U.S. 667, 682-683 480 U.S. 39, 57 492 U.S. 1, 9 499 U.S. 467, 492-495 506 U.S. 390, 405-417 512 U.S. 477 513 U.S. 298 514 U.S. 419, 434-436 536 U.S. 403, 412-422 547 U.S. 518 Circuit Courts 831 F.2d 176, 177 979 F.2d 746, 749-750 94 F.3d 1321, 1323-1325 114 F.3d 1002 132 F.3d 463, 476 211 F.3d 1148, 1164-1165 278 F.3d 370, 375-379 285 F.3d 298, 316-325 296 F.3d 770 321 F.3d 915, 919 358 F.3d 1117, 1123-1124 379 F.3d 813, 818-819 423 F.3d 1050, 1054-1056 460 F.3d 1328, 1337 477 F.3d 1070, 1075 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2) 445 F. Supp. 2d 1079 460 F. Supp. 2d 226, 246

Blogged: How Appealing Unanimous three-judge Ninth Circuit panel recognizes a state convict's limited due process right of access to the evidence, used to convict him of sexual assault, for purposes of post-conviction DNA testing Decision of the Day Remarkable Ninth Circuit Decision on Inmate’s Right to New DNA Testing