Authorities Cited: United States Patent and Trademark Office Registration No. 18 United States Code 7 U.S.C. § 2024(b)(1) 8 U.S.C. § 1326 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) 18 U.S.C. § 1028(d)(7) 18 U.S.C. § 1546(a) 18 U.S.C. § 2252 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(1)(A) 28 U.S.C. § 1291 Supreme Court 471 U.S. 419 513 U.S. 64 527 U.S. 373, 388 Circuit Courts 82 F.3d 849, 856 353 F.3d 766, 769 357 F.3d 1061, 1065 442 F.3d 213 447 F.3d 1212, 1229 508 F.3d 603, 609 515 F.3d 1234 519 F.3d 962, 965 520 F.3d 912, 915 Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure Fed. R. Crim. P. 29(a) Fed. R. Crim. P. 29(c)(1) Fed. R. Crim. P. 29(c)(3) Fed. R. Crim. P. 52(b)

Blogged: How Appealing Another federal appellate court holds that the crime of aggravated identity theft requires proof that the defendant knew that the means of identification belonged to another person How Appealing "Today we join the D.C. Circuit in holding that the crime of aggravated identity theft requires proof that, among other things, the defendant knew that the means of identification belonged to another person." California Appellate Report U.S. v. Miranda-Lopez (9th Cir. - July 17, 2008)