Davis v. Grant
Second Circuit: July 8, 2008
Appeal from the Southern District of New York
Full Text: PDF
Tagged: criminal, sentencing
Authorities Cited: 2 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 21 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1) 28 U.S.C. § 34 28 U.S.C. § 2254 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1) 28 U.S.C. § 2255 15 U.S. 153, 160 291 U.S. 97 304 U.S. 458, 464 372 U.S. 335 380 U.S. 400, 405 397 U.S. 337 400 U.S. 74, 89 400 U.S. 455, 468 422 U.S. 806 465 U.S. 3 465 U.S. 168 497 U.S. 836, 846 528 U.S. 152, 162 529 U.S. 362, 407-413 539 U.S. 166, 180 473 F.2d 1113, 1124 844 F.2d 1, 15 47 F.3d 577, 583 61 F.3d 897 140 F.3d 392 221 F.3d 100, 111 260 F.3d 87 263 F.3d 178, 184 289 F.3d 36, 42-43 331 F.3d 217, 248 346 F.3d 330, 342 362 F.3d 597, 601 468 F.3d 8 510 F.3d 382 450 F. Supp. 2d 396, 429-430 855 F. Supp. 1427, 1445-1446
Blogged: How Appealing May a criminal defendant who has chosen to represent himself at trial without the assistance of counsel elect, through disruptive conduct that causes him to be removed from the courtroom, to forfeit his ability to cross-examine adverse witnesses?