United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Showing opinions 1 to 20 of 448   Next

Vineberg v. Bissonnette November 19, 2008
Appeal from the District of Rhode Island
Before: Lynch, Selya, Lipez
Full text: HTML
Blogged:Appellate Law & Practice CA1: laches and holocaust painting case
Budiono v. Mukasey November 19, 2008
Review of Board of Immigration Appeals decision
Before: Lynch, Boudin, Stahl
immigration
Full text: HTML
IMS Health, Inc. v. Ayotte November 18, 2008
Appeal from the District of New Hampshire
Before: Selya, Lipez, Siler
ip, first amendment
Full text: HTML
Blogged:Appellate Law & Practice CA1: data-mined prescription information not protected speech
RI Hosp. v. Leavitt November 17, 2008
Appeal from the District of Rhode Island
Before: Howard, Torruella, Baldock
Full text: HTML
Blogged:Appellate Law & Practice CA1: Medicare fight over research ends in heroic victory for government
Corujo v. Eurobank November 17, 2008
Appeal from the District of Puerto Rico
Before: Howard, Lipez, Boudin
Full text: HTML
Island View Resident v. Blue Cross November 14, 2008
Appeal from the District of Massachusetts
Before: Lynch, Lipez, Boudin
Full text: HTML
Blogged:Appellate Law & Practice CA1: moody teens, ERISA, and shortening the limitations period
Fraticelli-Torres v. CDT Dr. Arnaldo November 13, 2008
Appeal from the District of Puerto Rico
Before: Howard, Lipez, Boudin
insurance
Full text: HTML
Nat'l Union Fire v. W. Lake Acad. November 13, 2008
Appeal from the District of Massachusetts
Before: Boudin
insurance
Full text: HTML
Blogged:Appellate Law & Practice CA1: Girl interrupted was “molested” not “exploited”
Zheng v. Gonzales November 13, 2008
Full text: HTML
US v. Grullon November 13, 2008
Full text: HTML
v. November 10, 2008
Appeal from the District of Puerto Rico
Before: Lynch, Selya, Howard
Full text: HTML
Blogged:Appellate Law & Practice CA1: laches and holocaust painting caseAppellate Law & Practice CA1: data-mined prescription information not protected speech Appellate Law & Practice CA1: Medicare fight over research ends in heroic victory for governmentAppellate Law & Practice CA1: moody teens, ERISA, and shortening the limitations period Appellate Law & Practice CA1: Girl interrupted was “molested” not “exploited”Appellate Law & Practice CA1: vindicative license revocation okay due to preclusion Appellate Law & Practice CA1: declaratory judgments not that preclusiveAppellate Law & Practice CA1: The District Court acted just too jerky in dismissing the complaintAppellate Law & Practice CA1: crack retroactivity doesn’t go below mandatory minimums Appellate Law & Practice CA1: Land Rover dealer not that oppressed Appellate Law & Practice CA1: developer plaintiff moves forward with “class of one” environmental caseAppellate Law & Practice CA1: a Checkbook is not a payment under ERISA
Andrew Robinson v. Hartford Fire November 10, 2008
Appeal from the District of Massachusetts
Before: Selya, Howard, Baldock
insurance
Full text: HTML
Blogged:Appellate Law & Practice CA1: declaratory judgments not that preclusive
US v. Boyd November 10, 2008
Appeal from the District of Massachusetts
Before: Howard, Lipez, Boudin
fourth amendment
Full text: HTML
Giragosian v. Ryan November 10, 2008
Appeal from the District of Massachusetts
Before: Torruella, Lipez, Baldock
environment, fourth amendment
Full text: HTML
Blogged:Appellate Law & Practice CA1: vindicative license revocation okay due to preclusion
v. November 7, 2008
Appeal from the District of Massachusetts
Before: Lynch, Selya, Lipez
Full text: HTML
Blogged:Appellate Law & Practice CA1: laches and holocaust painting caseAppellate Law & Practice CA1: data-mined prescription information not protected speech Appellate Law & Practice CA1: Medicare fight over research ends in heroic victory for governmentAppellate Law & Practice CA1: moody teens, ERISA, and shortening the limitations period Appellate Law & Practice CA1: Girl interrupted was “molested” not “exploited”Appellate Law & Practice CA1: vindicative license revocation okay due to preclusion Appellate Law & Practice CA1: declaratory judgments not that preclusiveAppellate Law & Practice CA1: The District Court acted just too jerky in dismissing the complaintAppellate Law & Practice CA1: crack retroactivity doesn’t go below mandatory minimums Appellate Law & Practice CA1: Land Rover dealer not that oppressed Appellate Law & Practice CA1: developer plaintiff moves forward with “class of one” environmental caseAppellate Law & Practice CA1: a Checkbook is not a payment under ERISAAppellate Law & Practice CA1: the limits of Scott v. HarrisAppellate Law & Practice CA1: cops can take your drivers’ license without seizing youAppellate Law & Practice CA1: First speaks on material misrepresentation Appellate Law & Practice CA1: forfeiture remand in light of Santos and excessive fines clauseAppellate Law & Practice CA1: Fifteen year mandatory minimum for guy in wheelchair trying to produce child pr0n okay
v. November 7, 2008
Appeal from the District of Maine
Before: Lynch, Howard, Torruella
Full text: HTML
Blogged:Appellate Law & Practice CA1: laches and holocaust painting caseAppellate Law & Practice CA1: data-mined prescription information not protected speech Appellate Law & Practice CA1: Medicare fight over research ends in heroic victory for governmentAppellate Law & Practice CA1: moody teens, ERISA, and shortening the limitations period Appellate Law & Practice CA1: Girl interrupted was “molested” not “exploited”Appellate Law & Practice CA1: vindicative license revocation okay due to preclusion Appellate Law & Practice CA1: declaratory judgments not that preclusiveAppellate Law & Practice CA1: The District Court acted just too jerky in dismissing the complaintAppellate Law & Practice CA1: crack retroactivity doesn’t go below mandatory minimums Appellate Law & Practice CA1: Land Rover dealer not that oppressed Appellate Law & Practice CA1: developer plaintiff moves forward with “class of one” environmental caseAppellate Law & Practice CA1: a Checkbook is not a payment under ERISAAppellate Law & Practice CA1: the limits of Scott v. HarrisAppellate Law & Practice CA1: cops can take your drivers’ license without seizing youAppellate Law & Practice CA1: First speaks on material misrepresentation Appellate Law & Practice CA1: forfeiture remand in light of Santos and excessive fines clauseAppellate Law & Practice CA1: Fifteen year mandatory minimum for guy in wheelchair trying to produce child pr0n okay
v. November 6, 2008
Appeal from the District of Massachusetts
Before: Lynch, Torruella, Stahl
Full text: HTML
Blogged:Appellate Law & Practice CA1: laches and holocaust painting caseAppellate Law & Practice CA1: data-mined prescription information not protected speech Appellate Law & Practice CA1: Medicare fight over research ends in heroic victory for governmentAppellate Law & Practice CA1: moody teens, ERISA, and shortening the limitations period Appellate Law & Practice CA1: Girl interrupted was “molested” not “exploited”Appellate Law & Practice CA1: vindicative license revocation okay due to preclusion Appellate Law & Practice CA1: declaratory judgments not that preclusiveAppellate Law & Practice CA1: The District Court acted just too jerky in dismissing the complaintAppellate Law & Practice CA1: crack retroactivity doesn’t go below mandatory minimums Appellate Law & Practice CA1: Land Rover dealer not that oppressed Appellate Law & Practice CA1: developer plaintiff moves forward with “class of one” environmental caseAppellate Law & Practice CA1: a Checkbook is not a payment under ERISAAppellate Law & Practice CA1: the limits of Scott v. HarrisAppellate Law & Practice CA1: cops can take your drivers’ license without seizing youAppellate Law & Practice CA1: First speaks on material misrepresentation Appellate Law & Practice CA1: forfeiture remand in light of Santos and excessive fines clauseAppellate Law & Practice CA1: Fifteen year mandatory minimum for guy in wheelchair trying to produce child pr0n okayAppellate Law & Practice CA1: District Court made all sorts of errors in awarding sanctions Appellate Law & Practice CA1: speedy trial act and conspiracy counts Appellate Law & Practice CA1: some – but not all – cops are abusing trust by buying drugsAppellate Law & Practice CA1: tax blindness instructionAppellate Law & Practice CA1: No 5th or 6th problem in trickery caseAppellate Law & Practice CA1: pleading the Fifth in one proceeding prevents use in later MSJAppellate Law & Practice CA1: attorney fees in successful forfeiture cutAppellate Law & Practice CA1: jury can always draw inferences against poor peopleAppellate Law & Practice CA1: It’s okay to Begay outside of of the ACCAHow Appealing "Justices question doctrines at heart of union-fees case"Decision of the Day Another Reason To Say No To DrugsDecision of the Day Posner Gets A Big One RightDecision of the Day Finally, Some Questions about the Wisdom of RLUIPADecision of the Day Seventh Upholds Student’s Right to Wear “Be Happy, Not Gay” T-ShirtDecision of the Day Seventh Chastises Ninth for Encouraging Mickey Mouse Law SuitsDecision of the Day Second Lets Whitman Off the Hook for Post-9/11 LiabilityDecision of the Day Crossing the Border? Leave Your Laptop at HomeDecision of the Day Fifth Circuit Divides Over How To Handle Sentencing ErrorCalifornia Appellate Report U.S. v. Williams (9th Cir. - Nov. 6, 2008)California Appellate Report Rogers v. Royal Carribean Cruise Lines (9th Cir. - Nov. 6, 2008)California Appellate Report E.S.S. Entertainment 2000, Inc. v. Rock Star Videos, Inc. (9th Cir. - Nov. 5, 2008)California Appellate Report People v. Stier (Cal. Ct. App. - Nov. 5, 2008)California Appellate Report Payne v. Rader (Cal. Ct. App. - Nov. 4, 2008)California Appellate Report People v. Garcia (Cal. Ct. App. - Nov. 4, 2008)
Mogel v. UNUM Life Ins. November 6, 2008
Appeal from the District of Massachusetts
Before: Torruella, Boudin, Schwarzer
finance
Full text: HTML
Blogged:Appellate Law & Practice CA1: a Checkbook is not a payment under ERISA
Commonwealth Land v. IDC Properties November 5, 2008
Appeal from the District of Rhode Island
Before: Lynch, Boudin, Schwarzer
Full text: HTML
Blogged:Appellate Law & Practice CA1: First speaks on material misrepresentation
Parker v. Gerrish November 5, 2008
Appeal from the District of Maine
Before: Torruella, Boudin, Dyk
fourth amendment
Full text: HTML
Blogged:Appellate Law & Practice CA1: the limits of Scott v. Harris

Showing opinions 1 to 20 of 448   Next