USA v. Hinkson

Ninth Circuit: May 30, 2008

Appeal from the District of Idaho

Before: Mckeown, Fletcher, Hug, Tallman

Full Text: PDF

Tagged: criminal, taxation, sentencing, discrimination, fifth amendment

Authorities Cited: United States Code 18 U.S.C. § 115 18 U.S.C. § 373 18 U.S.C. § 373(a) 18 U.S.C. § 641 18 U.S.C. § 642 18 U.S.C. § 704(a) 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(2) 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(3) Supreme Court 352 U.S. 1, 5 360 U.S. 264, 269 405 U.S. 150, 154-155 469 U.S. 45, 55 Circuit Courts 224 F.2d 915, 917 428 F.2d 465, 466 565 F.2d 1059, 1062 607 F.2d 840, 844-845 858 F.2d 456, 464 869 F.2d 452, 454 922 F.2d 413, 415 931 F.2d 542, 548 935 F.2d 445 960 F.2d 820 17 F.3d 1201 73 F.3d 1470, 1507 211 F.3d 1172, 1175 282 F.3d 1204 339 F.3d 886 339 F.3d 915, 919 343 F.3d 976 371 F.3d 1093, 1101 410 F.3d 598 420 F.3d 991, 1001 475 F.3d 1039, 1043 Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure Fed. R. Crim. P. 33 Fed. R. Crim. P. 33(b)(1) Federal Rules of Evidence Fed. R. Evid. 608(b)

Blogged: How Appealing "9th Circuit Says Judge Botched Murder-for-Hire Trial" How Appealing Divided three-judge Ninth Circuit panel grants a new trial to man convicted of soliciting the murders of an Assistant U.S. Attorney, an IRS Special Agent, and a U.S. District Judge How Appealing Divided three-judge Ninth Circuit panel grants a new trial to man convicted of soliciting the murders of an Assistant U.S. Attorney, an IRS Special Agent, and a U.S. District Judge How Appealing Divided three-judge Ninth Circuit panel grants a new trial to man convicted of soliciting the murders of an Assistant U.S. Attorney, an IRS Special Agent, and a U.S. District Judge California Appellate Report U.S. v. Hinkson (9th Cir. - May 30, 2008)