Kouvchinov v. Parametric Tech

First Circuit: August 8, 2008

Appeal from the District of Massachusetts

Before: Selya, Howard, Torruella

Full Text: HTML

Authorities Cited: United States Code 29 U.S.C. § 1101 29 U.S.C. § 1140 Supreme Court 411 U.S. 792, 802-805 477 U.S. 242, 249-250 Circuit Courts 889 F.2d 869, 881 896 F.2d 5, 8 946 F.2d 401, 404 950 F.2d 816, 823-824 63 F.3d 32, 37-38 99 F.3d 456, 466-467 150 F.3d 21, 29 161 F.3d 1106, 1114 175 F.3d 178, 184 262 F.3d 70, 77 277 F.3d 882, 892 329 F.3d 740, 746-747 404 F.3d 42, 45-47 498 F.3d 9, 12 507 F.3d 23, 31-33 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c)

Blogged: Appellate Law & Practice CA1: specific intent required in ERISA retaliation claim