Selya: Senior Circuit Judge, First Circuit
Showing opinions 1 to 20 of 110 Next
| Vineberg v. Bissonnette | November 19, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of Rhode Island | |
| Before: Lynch, Selya, Lipez | |
| Full text: HTML | |
| Blogged:Appellate Law & Practice CA1: laches and holocaust painting case | |
| IMS Health, Inc. v. Ayotte | November 18, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of New Hampshire | |
| Before: Selya, Lipez, Siler | |
| ip, first amendment | |
| Full text: HTML | |
| Blogged:Appellate Law & Practice CA1: data-mined prescription information not protected speech | |
| v. | November 10, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of Puerto Rico | |
| Before: Lynch, Selya, Howard | |
| Full text: HTML | |
| Blogged:Appellate Law & Practice CA1: laches and holocaust painting caseAppellate Law & Practice CA1: data-mined prescription information not protected speech Appellate Law & Practice CA1: Medicare fight over research ends in heroic victory for governmentAppellate Law & Practice CA1: moody teens, ERISA, and shortening the limitations period Appellate Law & Practice CA1: Girl interrupted was “molested” not “exploited”Appellate Law & Practice CA1: vindicative license revocation okay due to preclusion Appellate Law & Practice CA1: declaratory judgments not that preclusiveAppellate Law & Practice CA1: The District Court acted just too jerky in dismissing the complaintAppellate Law & Practice CA1: crack retroactivity doesn’t go below mandatory minimums Appellate Law & Practice CA1: Land Rover dealer not that oppressed Appellate Law & Practice CA1: developer plaintiff moves forward with “class of one” environmental caseAppellate Law & Practice CA1: a Checkbook is not a payment under ERISA | |
| Andrew Robinson v. Hartford Fire | November 10, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of Massachusetts | |
| Before: Selya, Howard, Baldock | |
| insurance | |
| Full text: HTML | |
| Blogged:Appellate Law & Practice CA1: declaratory judgments not that preclusive | |
| v. | November 7, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of Massachusetts | |
| Before: Lynch, Selya, Lipez | |
| Full text: HTML | |
| Blogged:Appellate Law & Practice CA1: laches and holocaust painting caseAppellate Law & Practice CA1: data-mined prescription information not protected speech Appellate Law & Practice CA1: Medicare fight over research ends in heroic victory for governmentAppellate Law & Practice CA1: moody teens, ERISA, and shortening the limitations period Appellate Law & Practice CA1: Girl interrupted was “molested” not “exploited”Appellate Law & Practice CA1: vindicative license revocation okay due to preclusion Appellate Law & Practice CA1: declaratory judgments not that preclusiveAppellate Law & Practice CA1: The District Court acted just too jerky in dismissing the complaintAppellate Law & Practice CA1: crack retroactivity doesn’t go below mandatory minimums Appellate Law & Practice CA1: Land Rover dealer not that oppressed Appellate Law & Practice CA1: developer plaintiff moves forward with “class of one” environmental caseAppellate Law & Practice CA1: a Checkbook is not a payment under ERISAAppellate Law & Practice CA1: the limits of Scott v. HarrisAppellate Law & Practice CA1: cops can take your drivers’ license without seizing youAppellate Law & Practice CA1: First speaks on material misrepresentation Appellate Law & Practice CA1: forfeiture remand in light of Santos and excessive fines clauseAppellate Law & Practice CA1: Fifteen year mandatory minimum for guy in wheelchair trying to produce child pr0n okay | |
| US v. Polk | October 30, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of Maine | |
| Before: Lynch, Selya, Howard | |
| criminal, sentencing | |
| Full text: HTML | |
| Blogged:Appellate Law & Practice CA1: Fifteen year mandatory minimum for guy in wheelchair trying to produce child pr0n okay | |
| Jensen v. Phillips Screw | October 29, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of Massachusetts | |
| Before: Selya, Boudin, Dyk | |
| finance | |
| Full text: HTML | |
| Blogged:Appellate Law & Practice CA1: District Court made all sorts of errors in awarding sanctions | |
| Ligoussou v. Mukasey | October 27, 2008 |
| Review of Board of Immigration Appeals decision | |
| Before: Lynch, Selya, Lipez | |
| immigration | |
| Full text: HTML | |
| In Re: Grand Jury v. | October 24, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of Massachusetts | |
| Before: Selya, Howard, Baldock | |
| Full text: HTML | |
| Blogged:Appellate Law & Practice CA1: no contempt for attorney that disclosed grand jury materials that he provided | |
| US v. One Star Class Sloop | October 20, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of Massachusetts | |
| Before: Lynch, Selya, Schwarzer | |
| criminal | |
| Full text: HTML | |
| Blogged:Appellate Law & Practice CA1: attorney fees in successful forfeiture cut | |
| Bebri v. Mukasey | October 17, 2008 |
| Review of Board of Immigration Appeals decision | |
| Before: Selya, Howard, Baldock | |
| immigration | |
| Full text: HTML | |
| Siahaan v. Mukasey | October 17, 2008 |
| Review of Board of Immigration Appeals decision | |
| Before: Selya, Torruella, Nguez | |
| immigration | |
| Full text: HTML | |
| US v. Morales-Machuca | October 17, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of Puerto Rico | |
| Before: Selya, Howard, Torruella | |
| criminal, sentencing | |
| Full text: HTML | |
| Blogged:Appellate Law & Practice CA1: jury can always draw inferences against poor people | |
| Melendez-Santana v. PR Ports Auth. | October 16, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of Puerto Rico | |
| Before: Lynch, Selya, Schwarzer | |
| Full text: HTML | |
| US v. LNU | October 10, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of New Hampshire | |
| Before: Lynch, Selya, Schwarzer | |
| criminal, sentencing, fifth amendment, fourth amendment | |
| Full text: HTML | |
| Blogged:Appellate Law & Practice CA1: no reasonable expectation of privacy in unpaid storage locker | |
| Puerto Ricans for PR v. Dalmau-Ramirez | October 6, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of Puerto Rico | |
| Before: Lynch, Selya, Schwarzer | |
| Full text: HTML | |
| Blogged:Appellate Law & Practice CA1: translation problems translate into claim preclusion and Rooker-Feldman problems | |
| Gray v. Evercore Restructuri | October 6, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of Massachusetts | |
| Before: Selya, Howard, Stafford | |
| Full text: HTML | |
| Blogged:Appellate Law & Practice CA1: file the notice of appeal right | |
| Gray v. Evercore Restructuri | October 6, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of Massachusetts | |
| Before: Selya, Howard, Stafford | |
| Full text: HTML | |
| Enica v. Principi | October 6, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of Massachusetts | |
| Before: Selya, Lipez | |
| Full text: HTML | |
| Blogged:Appellate Law & Practice CA1: reasonable accommodation issue creates question of fact | |
| Levasseur v. US Postal Serv. | October 1, 2008 |
| Appeal from the District of New Hampshire | |
| Before: Selya, Howard, Lipez | |
| Full text: HTML | |
| Blogged:Appellate Law & Practice CA1: government liable when postal workers steal mail for political ends | |
Showing opinions 1 to 20 of 110 Next